How do we balance having fun and being serious about what we’re doing?
William Irvine’s book, A Guide to the Good Life, on Stoic wisdom can give us some guidance. Stoics want to live meaningful lives. One way to create meaning is having a desire to be tested. Seneca, one of the well-known Stoics said: “So far…is he from shrinking from the buffetings of circumstances or of men, that he counts even injury profitable, for through it he finds a means of putting himself to the proof and makes trial of his virtue.” Seneca uses the word “injury” to refer to judgments from others. In today’s words Seneca might say: Do we shrink from challenges, even judgments, because through them we find a means to prove and test ourselves?
Stoics practice seeing value in stressful events that occur to them. They do their best to see other people’s judgments or unexpected struggles as valuable experiences. They also practice denying themselves certain comforts that aren’t aligned with their goals. Doing this improves their ability to deal with the specific stressors that they’ll encounter on the learning journeys they’ve chosen. They practice being grateful for what they have, rather than fixate on what they don’t have. Doing this helps them focus in the moment on the current challenge.
Stoics are serious about how they approach life and it may seem as if they don’t have very much fun. However, they may have more fun than we think they do. Their practices shift their attention to the present moment, which can create more meaningful, engaging, and fun experiences.
Having Serious Fun
We can create meaningful lives for ourselves by finding ways to have serious fun. We do this by balancing fun with seriousness. Let’s consider an example of a female athlete who competes to see how well she can navigate this balance.
First, she’s serious about what she does by setting meaningful goals. Having clear, specific, and measurable goals gives her vision to direct her learning process. Let’s say she sets a goal of making the National Team for sport climbing this year. That goal is clear, specific, and measurable.
Second, she aligns three aspects of her practice process that help her have fun as she works toward her goal:
- Goal/process hierarchy: She values both the goal and the learning process, but she puts them into a value hierarchy. Her primary focus is on valuing and enjoying the stress she’ll experience; her secondary focus is on achieving the goal. Being judged by others and unexpected struggles will inevitably occur and are part of her learning journey. She sees these as valuable, learning experiences.
- Comfort-based motivation: We have a natural tendency to be motivated by comfort. This motivation could cause her to spend time socializing with her friends during practice sessions at the gym. Having a goal helps her deny such comforts and directs her comfort-based motivation toward her stressful training.
- Focus: She’ll have many failures as she works toward her goal. Failures can be difficult to deal with if she ties her self-worth to them. Rather, she ties failures to her effort. When she fails, she realizes what she should change about her effort, which shifts her attention to the moment. She doesn’t fixate on wanting to succeed; she focuses on the learning opportunities she has.
Her goal of making the National Team for sport climbing informs her about what she’ll need to learn. She’ll need to develop skills that are specific to sport climbing, such as moving quickly, resting effectively, and moving with precision. She’ll also need to develop a variety of physical strengths, such as endurance, power, and power-endurance. She integrates these into a training program so her training flows easily and effectively.
Her goal/process hierarchy helps her focus on the process of her training. Her comfort-based motivation helps her find the easiest way to do the training, considering the goal she wants to achieve. Her focus on the effort helps her deal with failures, seeing them as learning opportunities. Together, these three aspects help her have fun because they shift her attention into the present moment. She’s grateful for the opportunity to apply herself to something meaningful.
Climbing
We can do this for our own climbing. We’re serious by setting a clear, specific, and measurable goal: climbing a specific route that inspires us. We have fun because we align the three aspects for our learning journey. First, the climbing experience is more important than arriving at the top of the climb. Second, we allow our comfort-based motivation to help us climb efficiently, considering the goal we want to achieve. Third, we’re curious about our failures, when we literally fall short of the goal.
Having goals and aligning these three aspects help us have serious fun as we climb and live our lives. They help us meet challenges rather than shrink away from them. We use them not to prove our worth, but rather to prove that we’ve learned enough to pass a meaningful test we’ve chosen to engage in. We’re serious and having fun at the same time.
Practice Tip: Serious Fun
Cultivate a desire to be tested. First, be serious by identifying a meaningful goal. Second, have fun by aligning these three aspects.
- Goal/process hierarchy: Continually remind yourself that the learning process is more important than the goal so you enjoy your learning journey.
- Comfort-based motivation: Don’t chastise yourself for desiring comfort. Rather, direct your comfort-based motivation into the stress of the climb as you work toward your goal. Find the easiest, most efficient, way to climb.
- Focus: You’re not a better or worse person based on outcomes you create. Separate how you feel about yourself from your failures. Tie failures to your effort. Doing this will keep you curious about your learning journey.
This Post Has 12 Comments
Brilliant as always! As a yogi I have had hard lessons with enjoying the journey as opposed to focusing on the destination.
It’s a balance, right Harper? We need goals (destinations) to direct our lives, to follow what is most important to us. Yet the walking (and climbing) toward those goals must be done for its own sake. And that walking includes many challenges. It’s through them that we test ourselves, to see if we can achieve those goals, but also to test how well we can enjoy the journey… Thanks for sharing. a
…clear and great! Thanks!
I took a class with you, gosh probably 15 years ago, in Nashville. I appreciate and benefit from all the valuable insight you share in your blogs and books. One small piece of feedback on this post. Wouldn’t it just be, “Let’s consider an example of an athlete who competes to see how well she can navigate this balance.” If the subject was a guy would you have written, “Let’s consider an example of a male athlete . . .”
Hi Barb, Yes, been a while since that class. I can’t remember it we did it at Fosters or at Climb Nashville.
I would have written it the same way, substituting “male” for “female”. I guess there is some nuance between the two ways of writing it as you outline, but I’m not sure what it is, or if it perhaps offends the female gender. I certainly didn’t intend that.
Tell me more about the distinction between the two examples. I’d like to learn how to be more clear in my writing.
Hi, Arno! It was Climb Nashville back when it was in Sylvan Park. I learned so much! To put a year on it, if memory serves, your son had his 21st birthday during that week.
Nothing offensive about blog post. It just presented a little speed bump while I was reading and I was curious as to why make the distinction?
If you would have written same way, regardless of the gender, then that is fair, clear writing.
The nuance (which, since would have treated the same way, is not the case with your blog post) is writing that assumes “athlete” is male by default and that does not need to be specified, and that if an athlete is not male, it needs to be called out.
Thanks for sharing that Barb. I appreciate your feedback. Be well and keep climbing. a
Thanks, Arno! Appreciate being with you on this journey. Take care!
Hi Arno, I tend to disagree with Barb. Seems like “me vs. the other” type of thinking. Barb, I know Arno personal and I don’t think he meant it like that. Take it easy!
Hey Jack. How have you been? Barb was just sharing a concern, as you are also. We all learn that way from each other. I trust you’re doing well. See you at the crags. a
Hi, Jack! I totally know that about Arno as well. We are all on this learning journey together. It was with respect and care that I offered the feedback, because it jumped out as a little speed bump while I was reading, and I was truly curious. It was a question to Arno, not a criticism.
Personally*