IMG_4076-w800-h600

Audio eLesson_2014-1103

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Sometimes I receive critical emails from people who strongly disagree with the Warrior’s Way material. These are not emails from people who have signed up for our email list. They are from people who come across the material when doing internet searches. They are so upset that they take time out of their busy schedules to write me.

We all tend to think we’re right in how we perceive life. This is a natural tendency, which can give us confidence to live our lives. Yet, thinking we’re right tends to limits learning. The critical emails I receive take it a step further, saying the Warrior’s Way material is wrong.

How do we balance thinking we’re right, with staying receptive to learning? Knowing our values can help. All of us, however, don’t have the same values. For example, valuing end results is very different than valuing processes. The former gives us confidence based on end results we achieve; the latter gives us confidence based on processes we engage. We shouldn’t expect others to agree with us if our values are different. So, how do we live our lives when we know we won’t get agreement from everyone? We need to develop awareness and then speak from that awareness.

The “I’m right, you’re wrong” approach is unaware. It’s unaware that the universe cycles between the poles of duality, seeking balance. We can’t have a left without a right. Left and right create the poles of a cycle. Valuing end results clings to one pole of this duality, seeking to validate what we perceive is right. Valuing processes pulsates between them, modifying what we perceive is right. Life is not one pole of a cycle—an end result—to validate; it’s embracing both poles—a process—to modify. Developing awareness leads us away from valuing end results to valuing processes.

The “I’m right, you’re wrong” approach limits learning, but we tend to take it further. We not only think we’re right, but we want to force others to think like we do. One of the main tenets of Zen is to leave others alone and let them figure out their own life journey. We tend not to leave others alone, but rather interfere with their journey. We want more people to agree with our perspective. The bigger our group, the more we feel comfortable that our way is right, and with a bigger group it’s easier to validate that we’re right.

Friedrich Nietzsche said: “You have your way. I have my way. As for the right way, the correct way, and the only way, it does not exist.” The Warrior’s Way is one way that people can consider including in their journey. It’s one expression of reality that gives others options to consider.

Since we all have varying perspectives, we’re all wrong, not right, in our understanding of ultimate reality. How do we maintain confidence to live our lives if we know we’re wrong? Should we just stay quiet until we know ultimate reality? No, we’ll never know ultimate reality. Our confidence doesn’t come from knowing we’re right and others are wrong, it comes from knowing we have a process that goes beyond right and wrong, that includes all perspectives so we can dig deep within ourselves to learn. Valuing processes over end results complements learning.

Having different values will cause others to criticize us. Critics provide learning opportunities, even if it’s only to diminish our egos. When I receive critical emails I can notice my ego react. Does it get defensive, protecting its identity? Or, do I consider what they’re saying and find a way to balance my perspective? In other words, do I stay in my comfort zone and protect an end result of how the material is now, validating it. Or, do I allow myself be feel the stress, look for connections, and modify it? Sometimes I do the former, sometimes both, but my overall intention is to live the material, to do the latter.

It’s interesting to consider why something would irritate us, such as a blog post on the internet, that isn’t addressed to us personally. Perhaps we take it personally because it speaks to something inside us that hasn’t been addressed. The universe requires balance. Irritation is the universe’s way to letting us know we’re out of balance. We’re irritated because we’re too far to the left or right. Other people’s perspectives conflict with ours. In fact, the farther we are to the left or right the more we’re irritated, the more angry we are, and the more we’re willing to take actions to express that anger. Extremist groups come from the extremes of left/right thinking.

Socrates reminds us that the unexamined life is not worth living. He’s not talking about examining other people’s lives; he’s talking about examining our own lives. The Warrior’s Way is a process to examine our own lives. It’s helped me examine my life, made me more aware and now I speak from that awareness. Critics could learn something from Socrates.

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter

This Post Has 6 Comments

  1. Jaime

    Great writting Arno…Always teaching us something new!

  2. George Hicks

    I am sure people are not always very diplomatic with their critiques, so it’s probably difficult sometimes to appreciate that the responses you get have a positive side regardless of the merits of their opinions or (at times) the tactlessness of their delivery. Getting criticism means you have struck a chord. Some of it probably helps you better understand how the people you are trying to communicate with think, which might cause you to address your message to specific perspectives you might not have considered before. I am sure it’s tough being a target, but that’s part of striking a high profile. And Nietzsche is certainly correct about their being no “only way,” which is one of the things that makes teaching inherently difficult.

  3. David Kessler

    Arno. I have read your WW book and listened to the CD set several times in an effort to internalize better for recall under stress on the crag. This article elicits my curiosity. What were some of the points of objection to the WW??
    David Kessler
    Retiree, climber, amga instructor in Chattanooga

    1. Arno

      Hi David, Objections are broad from objecting to teaching falling, to Castaneda references, to just generally thinking the ww material is new age psychobabble. It’s usually from folks who have not read the books or delved deeply into the material. Critiques I get from people who have delved deeply are obviously more helpful, and as George Hicks in his comments points out, critics can help “better understand how the people you are trying to communicate with think, which might cause you to address your message to specific perspectives you might not have considered before.” That’s helpful. a

  4. chris Howes

    Seems to be that the critics haven’t read anything about Humanistic education or even Jesuit pedagogy either come to that. But yes, it is as old as Socrates indeed.

  5. Greg Leach

    Keeping values fluid allows space to move toward the poles as conditions arise/evovle. Another analogy of possible use is the taiji diagram where in the fullness of end results finds the emerging seed of process and in the fullness of process emerges the seed of end results (or yin and yang however it might work for you). Water (soft) flows and overcomes hard, to be set at a polar extreme leaves few options for movement. Words falter but experience with awareness finds it way. Life is practice. Thank you for your kind offering again this week Arno. Travel well, Greg.

Leave a Reply